30 Disadvantages of Being a Historian (Drowning in Dates)
Considering a career as a historian?
It’s easy to get swept up in the romance of it all:
- Diving deep into the past.
- Uncovering the narratives that shaped our world.
- Bringing history to life through detailed analysis and interpretation.
But there’s another side to the coin.
Today, we’re exploring the less glamorous, the demanding, and the downright challenging aspects of being a historian.
Complex research methodologies? Check.
Limited job opportunities? Unfortunately, yes.
The constant need for academic publishing and grants? Definitely.
And let’s not overlook the frequent struggle with interpreting incomplete or ambiguous historical evidence.
So, if you’re thinking about embarking on a journey into history, or just curious about what’s beyond those dusty manuscripts and intriguing artefacts…
Stay with us.
You’re about to get an in-depth understanding of the disadvantages of being a historian.
Limited Job Opportunities Outside of Academia
Historians often find that job opportunities outside of academia are quite limited.
In academia, historians can teach, research, and write about history.
However, in the non-academic job market, roles for historians can be less prevalent.
The skills developed in history studies such as research, analysis and writing are transferable and valuable in many fields, but roles specifically related to history are often in museums, archives, or government agencies.
These positions may be competitive and scarce.
In addition, some may find that roles outside of academia do not utilise their specific historical knowledge and expertise to the full extent.
Therefore, historians may need to be flexible and creative when seeking employment outside of the university setting.
Dependent on Grant Funding for Research Projects
Historians often rely on grants to fund their research projects.
This means that they have to spend a significant amount of time applying for various grants and scholarships, often with no guarantee of success.
Additionally, the availability of grants can vary greatly and are highly competitive.
This can lead to periods of financial uncertainty and may cause stress and pressure.
Furthermore, the reliance on grant funding also means that a historian’s research may be influenced or restricted by the interests of the funding organization.
This could limit the scope of the historian’s work and potentially compromise their academic freedom.
Emotional Impact of Studying Traumatic Historical Events
Historians often delve into the most tragic and traumatic events of human history.
They study wars, genocides, epidemics, and other devastating occurrences to gain a deeper understanding of the past.
The constant exposure to these cruel aspects of human history can take a toll on their emotional and mental health.
It is not uncommon for historians to experience sadness, depression, or a sense of helplessness due to their extensive study of these events.
Moreover, historians often grapple with the moral implications of these events, which can lead to feelings of frustration and despair.
This emotional impact can be heightened when historians are personally connected to the events they are studying.
Despite these challenges, historians continue to study these events to contribute to a greater understanding of our past and to ensure that such tragedies are not forgotten.
Difficulty in Achieving Tenure in Academic Institutions
Historians, particularly those who aspire to work in academic institutions, often face the challenge of achieving tenure.
Tenure is a permanent job contract offered after several years of service, typically seven.
However, the number of tenure-track positions available in institutions is often limited and competition is fierce.
Additionally, the process of achieving tenure is rigorous, demanding extensive research publication and significant contributions to the academic community.
Even after years of service, there is no guarantee of securing tenure, leaving many historians in a state of job insecurity.
This disadvantage is further compounded by the fact that non-tenured positions often pay less and offer fewer benefits.
Need to Constantly Publish or Perish to Advance Career
In the field of history, the phrase publish or perish is often used to describe the pressure historians face to continuously produce scholarly works.
This is particularly true in academic settings, where the publication of articles, books, and papers is often tied to job security, promotion, and tenure.
If a historian is unable to consistently publish their research, they may find it difficult to advance in their career or even maintain their current position.
Furthermore, the writing process can be time-consuming and stressful, as it involves extensive research, fact-checking, and editing.
Also, the competition for publication in reputable journals is fierce which adds another layer of challenge.
The constant pressure to publish can lead to a stressful work environment and potentially limit the time historians can spend on other aspects of their work, such as teaching or archival research.
Balancing Teaching with Research Responsibilities
Historians often juggle multiple tasks, one of which is teaching at a university or college level.
In addition to giving lectures, historians are also expected to conduct their own research and contribute to the academic community through publication of their work.
This means that the historian’s workload often extends beyond the regular teaching hours, as they must find time for their personal research endeavors.
Balancing these two obligations can be challenging as both require a significant amount of time, focus, and energy.
This dual role can lead to long hours, high levels of stress, and a potential compromise in the quality of work if not managed properly.
Competition for Academic Positions in History Departments
Historians often find themselves in a highly competitive field, especially when it comes to securing academic positions in history departments at universities.
There are significantly more qualified candidates than there are open positions, leading to fierce competition.
Additionally, there may be a preference for historians who specialize in particular periods or regions, further narrowing the opportunities.
This competition can lead to job insecurity, long periods of temporary work, or the need to relocate to secure a position.
It can also result in historians needing to take on additional roles such as teaching to supplement their income.
Pressure to Specialize in a Marketable Historical Niche
Historians often face the pressure to specialize in a particular niche or historical era that is marketable or in demand.
The study of history is vast, spanning millennia and countless cultures and societies.
However, the job market for historians can be quite competitive, and not all areas of historical study are equally in demand.
To secure positions in academia or with certain institutions, historians may need to focus their studies on popular periods or themes, such as World War II or the Civil Rights Movement.
This could limit their academic freedom and creativity, as they may need to devote significant time and resources to studying and publishing work on their chosen niche rather than exploring other areas of interest.
This could also lead to a sense of monotony or stagnation in their work.
Lower Salary Compared to Other Professions with Equivalent Education Levels
Historians usually spend several years in higher education, often pursuing doctoral degrees.
However, despite the extensive education, the average salary for historians is often lower than for professionals with equivalent levels of education in other fields.
While historians may find their work intellectually fulfilling, the financial compensation may not be as high as in other sectors such as business or engineering.
This can be a disadvantage for those who value a high income or those who have significant student loans to repay after their many years of study.
Furthermore, the job market for historians can be highly competitive, which can also impact salary levels and job security.
Struggle to Maintain Objectivity in Controversial Historical Analyses
Historians are often tasked with analyzing and interpreting events from the past, some of which may be controversial or politically charged.
This requires a level of objectivity that can be difficult to maintain, especially when dealing with topics that are still contentious today.
Historians must strive to present an unbiased account, but personal beliefs, societal pressures, or political leanings can sometimes influence their interpretations.
This can lead to criticism, scrutiny, and even professional isolation if their work is perceived as biased or skewed.
Furthermore, the historian may also struggle with their own personal feelings when dealing with such issues, adding to the emotional toll of the job.
Managing the Volume of Available Primary Source Material
Historians often have to deal with an overwhelming amount of primary source material.
The study of history involves the examination of countless documents, records, artifacts, and other primary sources.
This information can range from letters and diaries to news articles, photographs, and government documents.
The sheer volume of available material can be daunting and time-consuming to sift through.
Additionally, these sources can often be disorganized or difficult to access, adding another layer of complexity to a historian’s research process.
Historians may find themselves spending more time in data management, organization, and retrieval than in actual analysis and interpretation of historical events.
This can be particularly challenging when working on large-scale projects or dealing with eras of history that have been well-documented.
Challenges of Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration
Historians often have to engage in interdisciplinary research collaboration, which presents its own set of challenges.
This requires historians to step outside their field of expertise and collaborate with professionals from various other disciplines.
While this can lead to innovative and insightful research, it can also result in miscommunication and misunderstanding due to differences in terminologies, methodologies, and theoretical frameworks used by different disciplines.
Furthermore, it can be time-consuming and demanding to familiarize oneself with multiple fields of study.
These challenges can cause stress and may slow down the progress of the research.
Ethical Implications of Representing Different Perspectives in History
Historians are often tasked with interpreting and representing various perspectives and narratives throughout history.
This responsibility, however, can lead to ethical dilemmas.
They may be faced with the challenge of accurately portraying events that could be sensitive or controversial.
At times, the sources available may be biased or incomplete, making it difficult to present a comprehensive and balanced view.
They may also struggle with the ethical implications of representing different perspectives in history, particularly those of marginalized or oppressed groups.
Historians often have to navigate these complexities and strive to provide an accurate and respectful representation of the past, which can be mentally and emotionally challenging.
Historians often face the complex task of navigating the politics of historical interpretation and memory.
The way history is understood and interpreted can vary greatly depending on cultural, political, and personal perspectives.
As such, historians may find themselves in difficult situations where their research and findings contradict popular beliefs or established narratives.
They may also face pressure from various groups or individuals to present history in a certain light or to omit certain facts.
This can result in accusations of bias, controversy, and even threats to their professional reputation.
Moreover, this can also lead to emotional stress as historians grapple with the ethical implications of their work and the responsibility of portraying history accurately.
Potentially Long Periods of Isolation During Research
Historians often spend a significant amount of time conducting solitary research.
They may have to dig through archives, read old documents, or analyze data for extended periods of time, much of which is done alone.
This might lead to feelings of isolation, especially for those who thrive on social interaction.
Additionally, this intense focus on research can also mean spending a lot of time indoors, which may not be appealing to everyone.
This intensive and sometimes solitary research is, however, crucial for historians to understand the past and interpret it accurately.
Addressing Misinformation and Historical Revisionism Publicly
Historians often face the challenging task of addressing misinformation and historical revisionism publicly.
In an era where information is readily available and can be easily manipulated, there’s a high chance of historical facts being twisted or misrepresented to suit particular narratives.
Historians therefore need to be vigilant in their research and presentation of historical events, often having to debunk inaccuracies or false interpretations.
This can be a contentious and stressful task, as it may involve clashing with deeply held beliefs or ideologies.
Additionally, the historian may face backlash or criticism from those who support the misinformation, adding another layer of difficulty to their role.
Difficulty in Securing Tenure-Track Positions
The field of history is highly competitive, with many qualified individuals pursuing a limited number of tenure-track positions.
This means that even after earning a PhD, which can take several years of rigorous study and research, historians may struggle to find secure, long-term employment in academia.
Many find themselves in adjunct or temporary positions, which can be less stable and offer fewer benefits.
Additionally, the pressure to publish original research and contribute to the academic community can be intense, as these factors often play a significant role in securing tenure.
This competition and uncertainty can make the job of a historian challenging and stressful.
Dealing With Limited Public Interest or Valuation of Historical Knowledge
Historians often grapple with the reality that their work may not always be highly valued or appreciated by the general public.
This can be due to a lack of interest in historical studies or a lack of understanding of the importance of understanding our past.
Despite their immense contribution to society, historians can feel undervalued and underappreciated in their roles.
Furthermore, this can impact funding for historical research and preservation initiatives, making it challenging to carry out important work.
Historians may also find it difficult to engage with audiences who may not see the relevance or importance of their work, leading to a struggle in effectively communicating the significance of historical knowledge.
Risk of Damage or Loss of Irreplaceable Historical Documents
Historians often deal with rare and irreplaceable documents and artifacts as part of their research and work.
These can range from ancient manuscripts to historical maps or photographs.
There is always a risk of damaging or losing these items, which can be incredibly stressful.
Depending on the value and rarity of these items, such loss or damage may not only have a significant emotional impact, but could also have legal or financial implications.
Furthermore, losing or damaging such items can limit the amount of information available for future research, which could impact the overall understanding of specific historical periods or events.
Hence, handling these materials requires considerable care, attention, and responsibility.
Accommodating Emerging Technologies in Historical Research
Historians are often faced with the challenge of integrating new technologies into their research.
Modern advancements such as digital archives, online databases, and computer algorithms can be hard to navigate for those who are not tech-savvy.
Not only does this require historians to learn new skills, but it also necessitates a shift in methodology and approach to historical research.
Moreover, these technologies can sometimes distort or oversimplify historical data, undermining the depth and nuance of traditional research.
While these advancements offer increased accessibility and efficiency, they pose significant challenges for historians in maintaining the accuracy and integrity of their work.
Pressure to Contribute to Pop History While Maintaining Scholarly Integrity
Historians often face the pressure to contribute to popular history trends while also maintaining their scholarly integrity.
They may be asked to simplify or popularize their work to make it accessible and engaging for the general public.
This can often lead to a trade-off between depth and breadth, as complex historical analyses are often reduced to engaging narratives or sound bites.
This pressure to be both a scholar and a popularizer may lead to compromises in the quality and accuracy of historical representation.
In addition, historians often face the challenge of presenting their work in a way that respects the complexity of the past, while also making it appealing and understandable to a broad audience.
It’s a delicate balance that requires not only deep knowledge and research skills, but also a knack for storytelling and public engagement.
Engaging Students Who May Find History Irrelevant or Boring
One of the significant challenges historians face, particularly those in educational roles, is the task of engaging students who may find history irrelevant or boring.
This is often due to a misunderstanding of the subject, the perception that it is merely memorizing dates and events, or the belief that historical events have no bearing on current affairs.
These misconceptions can make it difficult for historians to capture the interest of their students.
They must find creative and compelling ways to present historical information, making it relevant and engaging for the modern audience.
This requires a deep understanding of both the subject matter and the audience’s perspective, as well as innovative teaching methods.
If unsuccessful, historians may find themselves unable to effectively communicate the importance and relevance of their subject, leading to a lack of interest and engagement from their students.
Integrating New Historiographical Methods and Theories
Historians are constantly faced with the challenge of integrating new historiographical methods and theories into their work.
With the advancement of technology and the increasing availability of diverse sources, new approaches and interpretations of history are constantly emerging.
Historians must stay updated with these changes and adapt their research methods accordingly.
This often involves re-examining and re-evaluating their past work, which can be time-consuming and intellectually challenging.
Furthermore, these new methods may not always align with their personal views or the established norms of their field, leading to potential conflicts and disagreements among historians.
Despite these difficulties, the integration of new historiographical methods and theories is crucial for historians to continue contributing to the development and understanding of history.
Upholding Academia-Industry Relationships to Apply Historical Expertise
As a historian, you are often required to bridge the gap between academia and various industries to apply your historical expertise.
This can be a challenging task, as the expectations, objectives, and methodologies of academic research and industrial applications can significantly differ.
On one hand, academia is more focused on scholarly contribution and the pure pursuit of knowledge, while on the other hand, industries may be more interested in practical outcomes and immediate benefits.
Maintaining a balance between these two realms and managing to apply your scholarly knowledge in a way that is beneficial to the industry can be a demanding task.
Moreover, this could also mean that you may have to compromise on the depth of your research to meet the immediate needs of the industry, which can be a disadvantage for those who are passionate about thorough and in-depth historical research.
Challenges of Translating Complex Historical Research into Accessible Language
Historians often face the challenge of translating complex historical research into a language that is accessible and understandable to the general public.
This includes taking intricate, often specialized information and transforming it into a format that is engaging and informative for readers who may not have a background in history.
The process can be time-consuming and requires a certain level of skill and creativity.
There is also the risk of oversimplifying the material, which can lead to misinterpretation and misinformation.
It is a delicate balance to maintain the integrity of the historical facts while making them accessible and interesting to a wider audience.
Coping with the Digital Transition of Archival Resources
The digitalization of archival resources presents a significant challenge for historians.
Traditional methods of research involved physically going to libraries and archives, spending hours poring over books, documents, and other primary sources.
With the advent of digital archives, the amount of information available has significantly increased, making it more difficult to manage.
Historians have to be tech-savvy and familiar with various digital tools, databases, and research methods.
Additionally, the reliability and authenticity of online resources can also be a concern.
Some documents may not be digitized accurately, or may lack the context provided in a physical archive.
This transition also necessitates a constant effort to update skills and adapt to new technologies, which may be time-consuming and challenging for some historians.
Vulnerability to Cuts in Arts and Humanities Funding
Historians are often directly impacted by changes in government or organizational funding for the arts and humanities.
As these sectors are frequently seen as less essential than areas like science, technology, or healthcare, they are often the first areas to experience budget cuts.
These cuts can lead to fewer research grants, fewer job opportunities, and reduced salaries for historians.
Additionally, many historians are employed by universities, museums, and other cultural institutions, which are heavily reliant on public and private funding.
Therefore, any reductions in these funds can lead to job instability and insecurity.
Despite these challenges, many historians find their work fulfilling and continue to contribute to our understanding of the past.
Professional Isolation Due to Narrow Research Interests
Historians often specialize in very specific areas of history, which can sometimes lead to professional isolation.
Their research topics might be so niche that they find it challenging to find peers with the same interests.
This can make it hard to collaborate, exchange ideas, or even just have a conversation about their work with colleagues.
It can also make it more difficult for them to find positions in academic or research institutions, as the demand for their specific expertise may be limited.
Furthermore, this isolation could also lead to a lack of recognition for their work if their research field is not widely understood or appreciated.
Expectations to Contribute to Public Discourse as a Historical Authority
Historians often face the expectation to contribute to public discourse and make sense of current events in light of historical context.
This means they are under constant pressure to decipher, explain, and predict social phenomena based on past events.
The nature of their expertise means they are often called upon to comment on contemporary issues and are relied upon to provide accurate interpretations.
This can be particularly challenging as it requires staying abreast of current affairs, being able to relate them to historical precedents, and communicating complex ideas to the general public in an accessible way.
This added responsibility can be stressful and time-consuming, and historians may face scrutiny and criticism if their interpretations are not well received.
Balancing Historical Accuracy with Sensitivity to Cultural Narratives
Historians often face the challenge of balancing historical accuracy with sensitivity to cultural narratives.
They are tasked with the responsibility of presenting facts as they are but also need to be mindful of how those facts could affect cultural, racial, or religious groups.
This could be particularly challenging when dealing with controversial or sensitive historical events.
The historian’s role is to present an unbiased account of historical events, but they also have a responsibility not to cause unnecessary offense or upset.
Misrepresentation or a lack of sensitivity could lead to backlash or criticism from the public or specific groups.
Additionally, this balancing act can sometimes lead to self-censorship, which can affect the historian’s ability to present a complete and accurate picture of history.
Conclusion
And there you have it.
An unfiltered glimpse into the challenges of being a historian.
It’s not just about dusty archives and old manuscripts.
It’s commitment. It’s perseverance. It’s maneuvering through a labyrinth of historical paradoxes and academic debates.
But it’s also about the thrill of discovery.
The satisfaction of unveiling unknown aspects of the past.
The exhilaration of knowing you’re contributing to our understanding of human civilization.
Yes, the journey is complex. But the rewards? They can be extraordinary.
If you’re nodding along, thinking, “Yes, this is the intellectual challenge I’ve been seeking,” we’ve got something more for you.
Immerse yourself in our comprehensive guide on the reasons to become a historian.
If you’re ready to embrace both the triumphs and the trials…
To learn, to grow, and to thrive in this fascinating field…
Then perhaps, just perhaps, a career in history is for you.
So, take the leap.
Investigate, interpret, and inspire.
The world of history awaits.
The Unwanted List: Jobs That Are a Hard Pass for Many
No Stress, More Cash: Easy Jobs That Are Unexpectedly Profitable!
The Hallmarks of Success: The Most Prestigious Jobs in the World
Redefining Work: The Most Unusual Jobs in Existence
Freedom Careers: The Most Flexible Jobs for a Liberated Life
